4 Comments on White supremacists say Obama can boost cause

YM on Fri, 8th Aug 2008 8:15 pm


OBAMA-RECAPTURE KICKS OFF WITH A BANG

The drive to re-take the White House from Barack Obama has kicked
off with a bang, even before the presidential-election. Within hours of
the announcement by Richard Barrett that the “backlash” had begun,
news-sources around the world flashed the news. From the “Boston
Globe” to the “Taipai Times”, attention focused on the prediction
that Obama would go in, but that an “upheaval” would energize
Americans to recapture the government. The story was the first effort
by the Associated Press to employ new technology and involved video,
television, print and audio, all at once. The news-agency assembled a
TV-crew in Mississippi for the production, which featured flattering
pictures of Barrett and less-complimentary photos of his octogenarian
detractors, with Barrett as the lead. Nationalist web-traffic
immediately skyrocketed.

Gerald McManus was thrilled, noting that everyone else was
“playing second-fiddle” to the Nationalists. The Associated
Press called Nationalists “Nationalists,” despite attempts by
pro-minority-activists Mark Potock and Randy Blazak to substitute
smears and stereotypes. “Nationalists had to break through the
news-media barrier in order to be a social-reform magnet and we have
succeeded,” said Barrett. The piece referred to antagonist William
Winter, a member of the defunct, Clinton race-board, as a
“statesman,” even though Winter’s signature-notoriety had been in
failing to defeat the Confederate-flag vote in Mississippi. Winter,
86, expressed doubt that there would be any “widespread” backlash,
but even Negroes disagreed. Negress Kim Edwards lamented that, even
in the Oval Office, Obama “won’t be recognized as an American
President.”

Jason Robb, a lawyer who described himself as a “Nationalist,”
concurred that “Obama’s election could prompt more whites to get
involved in politics,” which Barrett said could break out into a
revolution. Barrett compared Skinheads to Minutemen of the American
Revolution, noting that the fifty-states could come together against
Martin Luther King, the way the thirteen-colonies united against King
George III. “The same thing can happen now,” he predicted. Barrett
insisted that elevation of minorities, under “Obamanation,” was
already setting off a drive to reinstall the “majority” and divest
minorities. Blazak described the Nationalist goal as the “Leave It to
Beaver” society, beneficial to “white, working-class people.” “Those
were the ‘good old days’ for straight, white males,” according to
self-described integrationist Blazak.

The Associated Press declined to describe Nationalists as
“pro-majority,” as they term themselves, insisting that the term
“pro-majority” was “elusive.” Approximately fifteen-percent of
reports describe Nationalists as “pro-majority” and twenty-percent as
“Nationalists.” The agency did, however, quote pro-minority activist
Charles Evers, who agreed that the Nationalists’ message was
“popular.” Evers, 84, who has debated Barrett on various occasions,
had previously said, “Oh, God, no,” when told that Americans were
demanding that the country be taken back. McManus, who spearheaded
the Nationalists’ drive to reinstate the Saint Patrick’s Day Parade
in Boston, exulted that Nationalists were “becoming the spokesman for
the entire cause.” Edwards claimed that Nationalists wished to
assassinate Obama, but Barrett urged that the overthrow be
“peaceful.”

Marie Pena of the Spanish news-agency inquired why Americans would
install Obama and, immediately, turn on him. Barrett explained that
the investiture was “the result of a generation of welfare, riots,
blackmail and political-corruption,” which the new-generation “will
be finally seeing in its full, sordid impact and be quick to overturn.”
Barrett said that, once evident, the recapture-drive would be
“unstoppable.” “We either move to Greenland or take America
back,” he emphasized, “but we aren’t planning to leave.” Reaction
to the Nationalist offensive from the political-left was swift. A
Communist-journalist asked, “Does white-trash really expect to do
what they say?” Barrett observed that majority-rule ousting
minority-tyranny had alrerady taken place in Czechoslovakia,
Yugoslavia and the Soviet Union. “It’s all a matter of patriotism and
progress,” he beamed.

http://www.nationalist.org/news/releases/2008/080801.html
Copyright 2008 The Nationalist Movement

Web Prospector on Sat, 9th Aug 2008 1:17 am


Mass Media have many white folks believing that they are a majority in the US.
I personally believe that the census books have been cooked through creative labeling of people.

Many European countries, with ageing populations and falling birth rates, desperately need to attract skilled foreign workers. Europe has no people to send here.

This means that most immigrants to the US leagal or otherwise are not generally white.

theo.johnson on Mon, 11th Aug 2008 10:04 am


Web Prospector, thanks for your comments. According to YM, I guess I’m helping out the nationalist cause by spreading the word about Barrett. It’s good to seem them have an increase in website traffic. That way people are aware of their plans and preparation can begin to “meet them at the pass”.

The world is changing and that kind of talk is generally ignored and disregarded. We still have yet to have our revolution.

Nick on Thu, 6th Nov 2008 3:37 pm


I browsed the stormfront fourum on the election. I very nearly vomited. Now, I’m proud to be Italian/Irish, but, as a 15-year-old white American, I can only be thankful that these people grow less with time.

Tell me what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!